Vitamin D Vs. D2

Vitamin D Vs. D2
Photo Credit Jupiterimages/Comstock/Getty Images

According to the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, or ODS, 37 percent of individuals in the United States take a vitamin D supplement. If you are using an over-the-counter supplement, you may be unaware that there are actually two forms of vitamin D: vitamin D-2 and vitamin D-3. While both forms of vitamin D possess the same functions, they differ in chemical structure as well as the sources in which they can be found.

Sources of Vitamin D

Vitamin D-2, also known as ergocalciferol, is a biologically manufactured form of vitamin D that is synthesized by radiation of a steroid in yeast. Ergocalciferol is most commonly found in prescription form, but it is also available in some over-the-counter supplements. Vitamin D-3, also known as cholecalciferol, is a naturally occurring form of vitamin D. It is synthesized from the exposure of a steroid in the skin to ultraviolet B rays in sunlight. Cholecalciferol is also present naturally in fatty fish such as tuna and salmon. Some foods, such as milk and cereal, are fortified with a biologically manufactured form of vitamin D-3 found in lanolin.

Function

While vitamin D exists as two separate forms, each one serves the same basic functions. The main function of vitamin D is to increase the level of calcium in your blood. Vitamin D achieves this by facilitating the absorption of calcium in your intestines. Vitamin D in of itself is actually useless to the body -- it must be transformed to its active form, known as calcidiol, before it can be used. When vitamin D enters the body, it is taken to the liver and then to the kidneys, where it undergoes a set of reactions to be activated. Once activated, it is ready to be used by the body. Among other things, vitamin D also plays a role in the growth of cells, immunity, insulin secretion and regulation of blood pressure.

Effectiveness

There has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of vitamin D-2. While some experts assert that vitamin D-2 is as effective as vitamin D-3 in raising the level of calcidiol in the blood, others contend that it does not provide equivocal effects. In a 2008 study published in the "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism," researchers found that administration of 1,000 international units a day of vitamin D-2 and D-3 for 11 weeks produced almost equivalent rises in the level of calcidiol. Conversely, a 2004 study published in the "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism" concluded that high doses of vitamin D-2 were less effective than vitamin D-3 in maintaining calcidiol levels. Participants in the study were given 50,000 IU of vitamin D-2 and D-3 for 28 days. Calcidiol levels in the D-3 cohort peaked at 14 days and remained high, and the levels in the D-2 cohort peaked after three days and then fell back to baseline.

Recommendation

Although the results of these studies are conflicting, the Office of Dietary Supplements says that vitamin D-2 and vitamin D-3 are both effective in elevating the level of calcidiol in the blood. However, this may only be true at lower doses, because vitamin D-2 appears to be less effective than vitamin D-3 at higher doses. Since more research is needed in this area, vitamin D-3 appears to be a better option. In addition, most supplements, multivitamins and foods are formulated with vitamin D3. However, vegans searching for a non-animal product may opt for vitamin D-2. The recommended daily allowance for vitamin D is 600 IU for males and females 19 to 70 years of age and 800 IU for individuals over the age of 70.

References

Article reviewed by Eric Lochridge Last updated on: May 13, 2011

Must see: Photo Galleries

Member Comments