Drinking three glasses of milk a day has been a hallmark of health in the U.S. for decades; its nutrient content is rich in vitamin D, calcium and riboflavin. A glass of milk contains approximately 7.9 g of protein. However, there are groups of people who do not believe milk is healthy to drink. More believers joined their ranks in 1993 when the United States approved the use of recombinant bovine growth hormone, rBGH, to increase milk production. As of 2011, the use of rBGh by U.S. dairy farmers continues to be controversial in the global market.
Bovine Growth Hormone
Somatotropin is naturally secreted by the pituitary glands of mammals to promote healthy body growth. This protein hormone was isolated in 1945 and used in experiments on the growth of laboratory animals. In its synthetic form, it can be called either rBGH or recombinant bovine somatotropin, rBST, and is used primarily to increase milk production of dairy cows in industrialized farming operations.
Effects on Cows
Cows treated with rBGH undergo chemical changes in order to produce larger quantities of milk. Increased milk production places greater demands on a cow’s body leading to a reduction of body mass, mastitis—an infection of the mammary glands—and delayed fertility. Antibiotics are given to cows who suffer from infections related to rBGH, and those antibiotics can leach into the milk produced for human consumption. Treated cows have a higher protein requirement, and some are fed ground up animal remains and chicken waste in order to meet these nutritional need.
At the Market
The U.S. FDA allows voluntary labeling of milk from cows not treated with rBGH or rBST, but any labeling is not a sign of FDA approval or support. The practice of labeling milk as being free of synthetic hormones is a point of contention between different interests groups, including farmers, the companies that produce rBGH and consumers who are either for or against the use of the use of synthetic hormones. Since natural bovine growth hormone is already found in milk, labeling is not necessary for untreated cattle. However, as of 2011, U.S. milk continues to not be accepted for purchase or use in the European Union, Japan, and Australia among many countries, due to concern about the safety of milk from treated cows. Consumers who prefer untreated cow’s milk look for dairy with the FDA approved labels.
Effects on Humans
Sufficient scientific evidence is inconclusive as to the safety or harm posed by consuming dairy products from rBST-treated cows. There are some health concerns still being addressed by those involved in food safety from farmers to the FDA. Among these concerns are the levels of pus present in milk from industrial dairy farms and the levels of antibiotics passed through the milk. Recombinant bovine growth hormone also increases the level of another hormone, IGF-1, which is directly responsible for the increased milk production, but can trigger cancer growth in non-infant humans. Studies current as of 2011 show that little, if any, IGF-1 is passed from the cow through the milk, but further research is necessary to assuage fears of safety hazards.
References
- Daily Burn: Whole Milk Calories and Nutrition Facts
- American Cancer Society: Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone
- "Physiological Reviews"; Biology of Somatotropin in Growth and Lactation of Domestic Animals; Terry Etherton and Dale Bauman; July; 1998
- "American Dairy Science Association"; Hormonal and Lactation Responses to Hormone-Releasing Hormone Treatment in Lactating Japanese Black Cows; H. Shingu, et al; 2004
- "Theriogenology"; Plasma GH, insulin-like growth factor-I and conception rate in cattle treated with low doses of recombinant bovine GH; Dr. C.R. Bilby, et al; 1999
- Food & Water Watch: Bovine Growth Hormone
- "The Sheer Ecstasy of Being a Lunatic Farmer"; Joel Salatin; 2010



Member Comments